recreated blog from 12 Jan 2012
1890 NY Civil War Widows
After reading that the 1890 (Census) Veterans and Widows Schedule for
New York survived I decided to check on Mary E. Foster widow of James
Foster who served from New York in the Union Army during the Civil War.
I found the following record for Mary E. Foster and everything appears
to be correct except for the locality.
The transcript of line 7 reads: Mary E Foster widow John, length of service 2 yrs 8 mos, PO Address: 134 E 55 St. Disability incurred = none.
|
Enlarged line 7 for Mary E. Foster |
|
Enlarged top of
form, transcribed: Persons who served in the Army, Navy and Marine Corps
of the United States during the war of the rebellion (who are
survivors), and widows of such persons in New York, County of New York,
State of New York, enumerated in June 1890. |
The confusion arises in that our Mary E. Foster lived in Rochester New
York in 1890, and for a number of years before and after 1890.
According to the Rochester City Directory, Mary E Foster was living at
90 Lake Street in Rochester in 1890. It would be easy to dismiss the
record above as belonging to another Mary E. Foster, but in a check of
Civil War veterans and widows for New York only 1 Mary E. Foster widow
of
John appears in the records and that does appear to be the Mary E. Foster the mother of Hattie L. Foster and grandmother of
Frank John Glover.
I would love to hear from anyone who has some ideas to explain this contradiction.
Record Source: 1890 U.S. Census, New York, New York, "Special Schedule:
Surviving Soldiers, Sailors, and Marines, and Widows," New York,
enumeration district (ED) 619, p. 1, Mary E. Foster widow of James;
digital images (
http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 18 Jan 2012); citing NARA microfilm publication M123, roll 45; Line 7.
No comments:
Post a Comment